COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
TIGO vs TLK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. TIGO scored 58.6, TLK scored 45.2 — TIGO leads.
Compare another set
TIGO
Millicom International Cellular S.A.
58.6
$93.22 · $15.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.4
TIGO leads
TLK
Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk
45.2
$15.20 · $15.0B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestTLK14.9x
- Fastest growthTIGO+0.3%
- Strongest balance sheetTLK0.60
- Highest qualityTLK81 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueTLK-50%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
TIGO
stronger →← stronger
TLK
76
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
81
47
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
57
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
31
TLK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
TIGO
TLK
$1.1bC+
FCF
$2.3bB
+0.3%C
Rev
-2.2%D+
4.85D
D/E
0.60B
23.3xB
P/E
14.9xB+
0.55A-
PEG
3.57D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
TIGO
TLK
43% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
50% below
~1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-16%/yr
+34%
1-yr DCF upside
+114%
+76%
5-yr DCF upside
+100%
+165%
10-yr DCF upside
+82%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
TIGO
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
TLK
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Revenue shrinking
- Foreign reporter (IDR)
The companies
TIGOMillicom International Cellular S.A.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $15.6b. 13% off the 52-week high of $107.13. PEG 0.55 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $98.39 (implying +6% upside).
Moat
Net margin 23% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 38% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 4.85 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
TLKPerusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $15.0b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $23.52 — deep drawdown territory.
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 123% of earnings on a 8.1% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where TIGO and TLK diverge
On the headline score the gap is 13.4 points in favor of TIGO. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueTIGO 56.7 · TLK 31.3TIGO +25.4
- QualityTIGO 76.0 · TLK 81.0TLK +5.0
- GrowthTIGO 46.7 · TLK 50.0TLK +3.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.