COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
KYIV vs TLK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. KYIV scored 68.5, TLK scored 45.2 — KYIV leads.
Compare another set
KYIV
Kyivstar Group Ltd.
68.5
$13.61 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
23.3
KYIV leads
TLK
Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk
45.2
$15.20 · $15.0B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestTLK14.9x
- Fastest growthKYIV+25.9%
- Strongest balance sheetKYIV0.39
- Highest qualityTLK81 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueKYIV-52%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
KYIV
stronger →← stronger
TLK
68
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
81
88
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
54
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
31
KYIV is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
KYIV
TLK
$311mC
FCF
$2.3bB
+25.9%A-
Rev
-2.2%D+
0.39B+
D/E
0.60B
20.0xB
P/E
14.9xB+
1.32B
PEG
3.57D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
KYIV
TLK
52% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
50% below
~-6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-16%/yr
+69%
1-yr DCF upside
+114%
+107%
5-yr DCF upside
+100%
+180%
10-yr DCF upside
+82%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
KYIV
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
TLK
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Revenue shrinking
- Foreign reporter (IDR)
The companies
KYIVKyivstar Group Ltd.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $3.1b. 18% off the 52-week high of $16.55. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 9 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $17.97 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
TLKPerusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $15.0b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $23.52 — deep drawdown territory.
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 123% of earnings on a 8.1% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where KYIV and TLK diverge
On the headline score the gap is 23.3 points in favor of KYIV. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthKYIV 88.2 · TLK 50.0KYIV +38.2
- ValueKYIV 54.1 · TLK 31.3KYIV +22.8
- QualityKYIV 67.5 · TLK 81.0TLK +13.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.