COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
TJX vs URBN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. TJX scored 49.5, URBN scored 65.3 — URBN leads.
Compare another set
TJX
The TJX Companies, Inc.
49.5
$140.71 · $155.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
15.8
URBN leads
URBN
Urban Outfitters, Inc.
65.3
$76.05 · $6.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestURBN14.3x
- Fastest growthURBN+11.2%
- Strongest balance sheetURBN0.46
- Highest qualityTJX79 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
TJX
stronger →← stronger
URBN
79
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
75
65
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
85
24
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
44
URBN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
TJX
URBN
$5.5bB+
FCF
$150mC
+8.1%B
Rev
+11.2%B
1.34C+
D/E
0.46B+
26.1xC+
P/E
14.3xA-
3.00C
PEG
1.38B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
TJX
URBN
16% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
207% above
~10%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~36%/yr
-21%
1-yr DCF upside
-70%
-13%
5-yr DCF upside
-67%
-1%
10-yr DCF upside
-64%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
TJX
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
URBN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
TJXThe TJX Companies, Inc.
Why now
Apparel Retail · market cap $155.4b. 17% off the 52-week high of $170.00. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $172.80 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 56% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $155.4b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
URBNUrban Outfitters, Inc.
Why now
Apparel Retail · market cap $6.5b. 10% off the 52-week high of $84.35. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $87.69 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where TJX and URBN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 15.8 points in favor of URBN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthTJX 65.0 · URBN 85.2URBN +20.2
- ValueTJX 23.7 · URBN 43.7URBN +20.0
- QualityTJX 78.8 · URBN 75.0TJX +3.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.