COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
TIMB vs TLK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. TIMB scored 56.6, TLK scored 45.2 — TIMB leads.
Compare another set
TIMB
TIM S.A.
56.6
$17.77 · $8.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
11.4
TIMB leads
TLK
Perusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk
45.2
$15.20 · $15.0B
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestTIMB10.2x
- Fastest growthTIMB+4.6%
- Strongest balance sheetTLK0.60
- Highest qualityTIMB83 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueTIMB-76%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
TIMB
stronger →← stronger
TLK
83
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
81
63
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
48
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
31
TIMB is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
TIMB
TLK
$1.8bC+
FCF
$2.3bB
+4.6%C+
Rev
-2.2%D+
0.66B
D/E
0.60B
10.2xA-
P/E
14.9xB+
1.53C+
PEG
3.57D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
TIMB
TLK
76% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
50% below
~-23%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-16%/yr
+251%
1-yr DCF upside
+114%
+318%
5-yr DCF upside
+100%
+440%
10-yr DCF upside
+82%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
TIMB
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Cut its dividend
- Foreign reporter (BRL)
TLK
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Revenue shrinking
- Foreign reporter (IDR)
The companies
TIMBTIM S.A.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $8.4b. Down 37% from 52-week high of $28.22 — deep drawdown territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $24.24 (implying +36% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 37% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 89% of earnings on a 8.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
TLKPerusahaan Perseroan (Persero) PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $15.0b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $23.52 — deep drawdown territory.
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 123% of earnings on a 8.1% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where TIMB and TLK diverge
On the headline score the gap is 11.4 points in favor of TIMB. The widest single difference is Value, where TIMB leads by 16.6 points.
- ValueTIMB 47.9 · TLK 31.3TIMB +16.6
- GrowthTIMB 62.8 · TLK 50.0TIMB +12.8
- QualityTIMB 82.6 · TLK 81.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.