At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestTILE14.1x
Fastest growthKTB+34.3%
Strongest balance sheetTILE0.43
Highest qualityKTB81 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueKTB-53%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
TILE
stronger →← stronger
KTB
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
81
63
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
79
64
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
80
KTB is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
TILE
KTB
$124mC
FCF
$422mC
+6.5%C+
Rev
+34.3%A
0.43B+
D/E
2.06C
14.1xB+
P/E
16.0xB+
0.95B+
PEG
1.89C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
TILE
KTB
72% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
53% below
~19%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-11%/yr
-43%
1-yr DCF upside
+99%
-42%
5-yr DCF upside
+112%
-41%
10-yr DCF upside
+131%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances · market cap $2.0b. 14% off the 52-week high of $40.50. PEG 0.95 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $45.25 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 21% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Beta 2.00 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
KTBKontoor Brands, Inc.
Apparel Manufacturing · $65.62 · beta 0.90
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $3.6b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $88.96 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +34% — in hypergrowth territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $97.50 (implying +49% upside).
Moat
ROE 43% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 158% of net income, helped by cash released from working capital ($123m) that doesn't repeat every year.
Risk
D/E 2.06 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where TILE and KTB diverge
On the headline score the gap is 12.5 points in favor of KTB. The widest single difference is Value, where KTB leads by 16.4 points.
ValueTILE 64.0 · KTB 80.4KTB +16.4
GrowthTILE 62.6 · KTB 78.7KTB +16.1
QualityTILE 76.7 · KTB 80.8KTB +4.1
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is KTB or TILE the better stock?
KTB scores higher: KTB 80.0, TILE 67.5 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do KTB and TILE differ most?
The widest gap is value, where KTB leads by 16 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. KTB leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are KTB and TILE scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.