COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
TIGO vs VZ
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. TIGO scored 59.1, VZ scored 55.4 — TIGO leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. VZ's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but TIGO's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
TIGO
Millicom International Cellular S.A.
59.1
$93.68 · $15.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.7
TIGO leads
VZ
Verizon Communications Inc.
55.4
$49.45 · $205.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestVZ12.9x
- Fastest growthVZ+1.4%
- Strongest balance sheetVZ1.84
- Highest qualityTIGO76 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueTIGO-43%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
TIGO
stronger →← stronger
VZ
76
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
71
47
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
52
58
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
46
TIGO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
TIGO
VZ
$1.1bC+
FCF
$21.8bA
+0.3%C
Rev
+1.4%C
4.85D
D/E
1.84C
23.4xB
P/E
12.9xB+
0.51A-
PEG
0.93B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
TIGO
VZ
43% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
39% below
~1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-8%/yr
+33%
1-yr DCF upside
+60%
+76%
5-yr DCF upside
+65%
+164%
10-yr DCF upside
+72%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
TIGO
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
VZ
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
TIGOMillicom International Cellular S.A.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $15.7b. 13% off the 52-week high of $107.13. PEG 0.51 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $98.39 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
Net margin 23% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 38% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 4.85 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
VZVerizon Communications Inc.
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $205.5b. 4% off the 52-week high of $51.68. PEG 0.93 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 23 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $51.56 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 131% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $205.5b market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Dividend payout 73% of earnings on a 5.7% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where TIGO and VZ diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.7 points in favor of TIGO. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueTIGO 57.8 · VZ 46.4TIGO +11.4
- QualityTIGO 76.2 · VZ 71.1TIGO +5.1
- GrowthTIGO 46.7 · VZ 51.7VZ +5.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.