Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. TIGO scored 50.3, CHTR scored 59.5 — CHTR leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. CHTR's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but TIGO's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
TIGO
Millicom International Cellular S.A.
Telecom Services · Quality-Growth
50.3
$79.48 · $13.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
9.2
CHTR leads
CHTR
Charter Communications, Inc.
Telecom Services · Quality-Growth
59.5
$103.38 · $13.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestCHTR2.9x
Fastest growthTIGO+0.3%
Strongest balance sheetCHTR4.42
Highest qualityTIGO75 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueCHTR-83%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
TIGO
stronger →← stronger
CHTR
75
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
47
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
37
36
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
93
TIGO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
TIGO
CHTR
$1.1bC+
FCF
$4.4bB
+0.3%C
Rev
-0.6%D+
4.85D
D/E
4.42D
20.1xB
P/E
2.9xA
0.31A
PEG
0.62A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
TIGO
CHTR
32% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
83% below
~-3%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
decline
+37%
1-yr DCF upside
+507%
+47%
5-yr DCF upside
+473%
+61%
10-yr DCF upside
+427%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
TIGO
Why this score
Raising its dividend
CHTR
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
TIGOMillicom International Cellular S.A.
Telecom Services · $79.48 · beta 0.90
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $13.3b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $107.13 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.31 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $98.39 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
Net margin 23% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 38% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 4.85 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
CHTRCharter Communications, Inc.
Telecom Services · $103.38 · beta 0.69
Why now
Telecom Services · market cap $13.4b. Down 62% from 52-week high of $268.77 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.62 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $175.11 (implying +69% upside).
Moat
ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 4.42 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 62% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where TIGO and CHTR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 9.2 points in favor of CHTR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueTIGO 36.1 · CHTR 92.7CHTR +56.6
QualityTIGO 75.4 · CHTR 62.0TIGO +13.4
GrowthTIGO 46.7 · CHTR 36.7TIGO +10.0
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is CHTR or TIGO the better stock?
CHTR scores higher: CHTR 59.5, TIGO 50.3 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do CHTR and TIGO differ most?
The widest gap is value, where CHTR leads by 57 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are CHTR and TIGO scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.