COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
THC vs UHS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. THC scored 49.5, UHS scored 69.1 — UHS leads.
Compare another set
THC
Tenet Healthcare Corporation
49.5
$280.77 · $22.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
19.6
UHS leads
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
69.1
$177.26 · $10.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestUHS7.2x
- Fastest growthUHS+10.0%
- Strongest balance sheetUHS0.69
- Highest qualityTHC84 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueTHC-33%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
THC
stronger →← stronger
UHS
84
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
68
35
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
59
42
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
82
UHS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
THC
UHS
$3.0bB
FCF
$845mC+
+5.4%C+
Rev
+10.0%B
1.52C
D/E
0.69C+
10.9xA
P/E
7.2xA
1.96C+
PEG
1.25B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
THC
UHS
33% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
19% below
~-9%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~0%/yr
+59%
1-yr DCF upside
+17%
+50%
5-yr DCF upside
+23%
+38%
10-yr DCF upside
+32%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
THC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
UHS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
THCTenet Healthcare Corporation
Why now
Medical Care Facilities · market cap $22.6b. Trading near 52-week high of $280.89 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $282.48 (implying +1% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 68% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 95% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 0% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
UHSUniversal Health Services, Inc.
Why now
Medical Care Facilities · market cap $10.4b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $246.33 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $193.94 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
ROE 20% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where THC and UHS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 19.6 points in favor of UHS. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueTHC 41.7 · UHS 82.2UHS +40.5
- GrowthTHC 34.7 · UHS 58.6UHS +23.9
- QualityTHC 84.1 · UHS 68.4THC +15.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.