COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AVGO vs TER
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AVGO scored 72.2, TER scored 64.1 — AVGO leads.
Compare another set
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
72.2
$368.45 · $1.8T
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.1
AVGO leads
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
64.1
$375.74 · $58.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestTER51.5x
- Fastest growthTER+57.9%
- Strongest balance sheetTER0.03
- Highest qualityTER90 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AVGO
stronger →← stronger
TER
80
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
90
93
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
79
51
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
37
AVGO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AVGO
TER
$32.8bA
FCF
$800mC+
+32.3%A
Rev
+57.9%A
0.74C+
D/E
0.03A-
61.3xC
P/E
51.5xC+
0.41A
PEG
0.97B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AVGO
TER
215% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
415% above
~47%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
>60%/yr
-76%
1-yr DCF upside
-85%
-68%
5-yr DCF upside
-81%
-54%
10-yr DCF upside
-72%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AVGO
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
TER
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
AVGOBroadcom Inc.
Why now
Semiconductors · market cap $1.8T. Down 26% from 52-week high of $495.00 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +32% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.41 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 45 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $527.88 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
Net margin 39% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 112% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 61.3x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Beta 1.47 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. P/S 23.2x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
TERTeradyne, Inc.
Why now
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials · market cap $58.7b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $487.91 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +58% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.97 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $449.80 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 26% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $58.7b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Trailing P/E 51.5x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Beta 1.79 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. P/S 13.2x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AVGO and TER diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.1 points in favor of AVGO. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthAVGO 93.1 · TER 78.6AVGO +14.5
- ValueAVGO 50.7 · TER 37.1AVGO +13.6
- QualityAVGO 79.7 · TER 90.2TER +10.5
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.