Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. TEM scored 18.1, HQY scored 69.2 — HQY leads.
Compare another set
TEM
Tempus AI, Inc.
Health Information Services · Quality-Growth
18.1
$70.93 · $12.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
51.1
HQY leads
HQY
HealthEquity, Inc.
Health Information Services · Quality-Growth
69.2
$92.61 · $7.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthTEM+50.4%
Strongest balance sheetHQY0.49
Highest qualityHQY71 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueHQY-2%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
TEM
stronger →← stronger
HQY
5
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
71
98
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
78
12
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
60
HQY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
TEM
HQY
-$263mF
FCF
$437mC
+50.4%A
Rev
+9.5%B
3.25D
D/E
0.49B
8.9xC+
P/S
—
—
PEG
1.14B+
—
P/E
33.4xC+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
TEM
HQY
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
2% below
—
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-9%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+2%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+19%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
TEM
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
Short track record
HQY
Why this score
Buying back stock
The companies
TEMTempus AI, Inc.
Health Information Services · $70.93 · beta 3.54
Why now
Health Information Services · market cap $12.8b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $101.56 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +50% — in hypergrowth territory. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $72.72 (implying +3% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
D/E 3.25 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$263m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Currently unprofitable (margin -17.8%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk.
HQYHealthEquity, Inc.
Health Information Services · $92.61 · beta 0.24
Why now
Health Information Services · market cap $7.7b. 14% off the 52-week high of $107.62. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $119.33 (implying +29% upside).
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 185% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where TEM and HQY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 51.1 points in favor of HQY. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
QualityTEM 5.3 · HQY 71.1HQY +65.8
ValueTEM 11.6 · HQY 59.9HQY +48.3
GrowthTEM 97.8 · HQY 77.9TEM +19.9
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is HQY or TEM the better stock?
HQY scores higher: HQY 69.2, TEM 18.1 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do HQY and TEM differ most?
The widest gap is quality, where HQY leads by 66 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are HQY and TEM scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.