COMPARE · Reviewed August 3, 2026
TDY vs VNT
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. TDY scored 58.8, VNT scored 70.1 — VNT leads.
Compare another set
TDY
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
58.8
$670.56 · $31.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
11.3
VNT leads
VNT
Vontier Corporation
70.1
$32.81 · $4.6B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
TDY
stronger →← stronger
VNT
64
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
81
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
61
39
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
75
VNT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
TDY
VNT
$1.1bC+
FCF
$373mC
+7.9%B
Rev
+4.1%C+
0.19B+
D/E
1.53C
32.5xB
P/E
11.6xA
1.40B
PEG
0.95B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
TDY
VNT
55% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
18% below
~17%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~1%/yr
-40%
1-yr DCF upside
+13%
-36%
5-yr DCF upside
+22%
-29%
10-yr DCF upside
+35%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
TDY
No notable signals flagged.
VNT
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
TDYTeledyne Technologies Incorporated
Why now
Scientific & Technical Instruments · market cap $31.1b. 3% off the 52-week high of $693.38. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $754.33 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 117% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 32x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
VNTVontier Corporation
Why now
Scientific & Technical Instruments · market cap $4.6b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $48.20 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.95 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $39.70 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.