COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

BMI vs TDY

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BMI scored 59.1, TDY scored 59.3 — TDY leads.
Compare another set
BMI
Badger Meter, Inc.
Scientific & Technical Instruments · Quality-Growth
59.1
$131.81 · $3.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.2
TDY leads
TDY
Teledyne Technologies Incorpora
Scientific & Technical Instruments · Quality-Growth
59.3
$629.15 · $29.2B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestTDY30.4x
  • Fastest growthTDY+7.9%
  • Strongest balance sheetBMI0.03
  • Highest qualityBMI87 / 100
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD59.1/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY87.2GROWTH46.4VALUE51.0
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD59.3/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY63.9GROWTH76.5VALUE42.6
BMITDYQuality87.263.9Growth46.476.5Value51.042.6
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-9%18%25x36xBMITDY

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFBMI$150mTDY$1.1b
RevBMI+0.8%TDY+7.9%
D/EBMI0.03TDY0.19
P/EBMI30.9xTDY30.4x
PEGBMI3.17TDY1.40
BMI
stronger →← stronger
TDY
87
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
64
46
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
77
51
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
43
BMI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
BMI
TDY
$150mC
FCF
$1.1bC+
+0.8%C
Rev
+7.9%B
0.03A-
D/E
0.19B+
30.9xB
P/E
30.4xB
3.17D
PEG
1.40B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
BMI
TDY
4% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
45% above
~8%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~15%/yr
-13%
1-yr DCF upside
-35%
-4%
5-yr DCF upside
-31%
+12%
10-yr DCF upside
-24%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
BMI
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
  • Durable high returns
TDY
No notable signals flagged.
BMIBadger Meter, Inc.
Scientific & Technical Instruments · $131.81 · beta 0.64
Why now
Scientific & Technical Instruments · market cap $3.8b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $204.00 — deep drawdown territory. 9 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $155.44 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 120% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 31x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
TDYTeledyne Technologies Incorpora
Scientific & Technical Instruments · $629.15 · beta 0.92
Why now
Scientific & Technical Instruments · market cap $29.2b. 10% off the 52-week high of $697.67. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $757.25 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 117% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 30x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
TDY leads BMI by 1.5 points (59.2 to 57.7), its sharpest advantage coming in PEG (grade B). A contrarian could still prefer BMI for its stronger D/E (grade A-).
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where BMI and TDY diverge

The two are effectively level on the headline score. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.