COMPARE · Data as of October 13, 2026

SYF vs ECPG

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SYF scored 85.0, ECPG scored 81.0 — SYF leads.
Compare another set
SYF
Synchrony Financial
Credit Services · Financial strength
72.9Fin
$73.59 · $23.9B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
5.8
SYF leads
ECPG
Encore Capital Group, Inc.
Credit Services · Financial strength
67.1Fin
$105.60 · $2.2B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestSYF7.5x
  • Fastest growthECPG+34.4%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD72.9/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANFINANCIAL72.9
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD67.1/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANFINANCIAL67.1
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-10%44%2.5x13xSYFECPG

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFSYF$9.7bECPG$125m
RevSYF-0.5%ECPG+34.4%
P/ESYF7.5xECPG8.0x
PEGSYF0.89ECPG0.17
SYF
ECPG
$9.7bB+
FCF
$125mC
-0.5%D+
Rev
+34.4%A
—
D/E
3.88D
7.5xA
P/E
8.0xA-
0.89B+
PEG
0.17A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
SYFSynchrony Financial
Credit Services · $73.59 · beta 1.34
Why now
Credit Services · market cap $23.9b. 17% off the 52-week high of $88.77. PEG 0.89 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 24 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $88.17 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 36% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 21% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
ECPGEncore Capital Group, Inc.
Credit Services · $105.60 · beta 1.31
Why now
Credit Services · market cap $2.2b. Trading near 52-week high of $105.74 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +34% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.17 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $115.67 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
D/E 3.88 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trading within 0% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Credit-cycle exposure — provisions tend to lag actual loan deterioration by 2-3 quarters; a sharp uptick in net charge-offs is a leading indicator the market often misses until it's already priced.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Common questions

Is SYF or ECPG the better stock?

SYF scores higher: SYF 85.0, ECPG 81.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

How are SYF and ECPG scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.