COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
SSD vs SUZ
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SSD scored 58.3, SUZ scored 54.8 — SSD leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. SSD's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but SUZ's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
SSD
Simpson Manufacturing Company,
58.3
$188.77 · $7.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.5
SSD leads
SUZ
Suzano S.A.
54.8
$8.78 · $10.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestSUZ6.9x
- Fastest growthSSD+6.5%
- Strongest balance sheetSSD0.21
- Highest qualitySSD83 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueSUZ-27%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
SSD
stronger →← stronger
SUZ
83
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
37
48
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
98
SSD is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
SSD
SUZ
$468mC
FCF
$951mC+
+6.5%C+
Rev
+5.7%C+
0.21B+
D/E
1.99D
20.7xB
P/E
6.9xA
3.80D
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
SSD
SUZ
28% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
27% below
~12%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-3%/yr
-26%
1-yr DCF upside
+33%
-22%
5-yr DCF upside
+38%
-16%
10-yr DCF upside
+45%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
SSD
Why this score
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
SUZ
Why this score
- Foreign reporter (BRL)
The companies
SSDSimpson Manufacturing Company,
Why now
Lumber & Wood Production · market cap $7.7b. 12% off the 52-week high of $213.49. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $219.00 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 124% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
SUZSuzano S.A.
Why now
Paper & Paper Products · market cap $10.8b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $11.54 — deep drawdown territory. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $12.57 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
Net margin 27% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where SSD and SUZ diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.5 points in favor of SSD. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueSSD 47.7 · SUZ 98.1SUZ +50.4
- QualitySSD 83.2 · SUZ 61.9SSD +21.3
- GrowthSSD 50.0 · SUZ 37.3SSD +12.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.