COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
SLVM vs SUZ
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SLVM scored 34.3, SUZ scored 54.8 — SUZ leads.
Compare another set
SLVM
Sylvamo Corp
34.3
$36.79 · $1.5B
Score gap
20.5
SUZ leads
SUZ
Suzano S.A.
54.8
$8.78 · $10.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestSUZ6.9x
- Fastest growthSUZ+5.7%
- Strongest balance sheetSLVM0.88
- Highest qualitySUZ62 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueSUZ-27%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
SLVM
stronger →← stronger
SUZ
54
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
15
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
37
51
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
98
SUZ is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
SLVM
SUZ
$10mC-
FCF
$951mC+
-9.3%D
Rev
+5.7%C+
0.88B
D/E
1.99D
15.2xB+
P/E
6.9xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
SLVM
SUZ
913% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
27% below
~60%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-3%/yr
-89%
1-yr DCF upside
+33%
-90%
5-yr DCF upside
+38%
-92%
10-yr DCF upside
+45%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
SLVM
No notable signals flagged.
SUZ
Why this score
- Foreign reporter (BRL)
The companies
SLVMSylvamo Corp
Why now
Paper & Forest · market cap $1.5b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $56.80 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -9% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating.
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Revenue contracting -9% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.1% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
SUZSuzano S.A.
Why now
Paper & Paper Products · market cap $10.8b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $11.54 — deep drawdown territory. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $12.57 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
Net margin 27% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where SLVM and SUZ diverge
On the headline score the gap is 20.5 points in favor of SUZ. The widest single difference is Value, where SUZ leads by 47.3 points.
- ValueSLVM 50.8 · SUZ 98.1SUZ +47.3
- GrowthSLVM 14.7 · SUZ 37.3SUZ +22.6
- QualitySLVM 54.2 · SUZ 61.9SUZ +7.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.