COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BCC vs SUZ
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BCC scored 37.2, SUZ scored 54.8 — SUZ leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. BCC's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but SUZ's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BCC
Boise Cascade Company
37.2
$82.47 · $2.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
17.6
SUZ leads
SUZ
Suzano S.A.
54.8
$8.78 · $10.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestSUZ6.9x
- Fastest growthSUZ+5.7%
- Strongest balance sheetBCC0.27
- Highest qualitySUZ62 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueSUZ-27%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BCC
stronger →← stronger
SUZ
50
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
43
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
37
24
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
98
SUZ is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BCC
SUZ
$103mC
FCF
$951mC+
-1.5%D+
Rev
+5.7%C+
0.27B+
D/E
1.99D
28.0xC+
P/E
6.9xA
2.94C
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BCC
SUZ
24% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
27% below
~20%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-3%/yr
-38%
1-yr DCF upside
+33%
-19%
5-yr DCF upside
+38%
+21%
10-yr DCF upside
+45%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BCC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cut its dividend
SUZ
Why this score
- Foreign reporter (BRL)
The companies
BCCBoise Cascade Company
Why now
Lumber & Wood Production · market cap $2.9b. 10% off the 52-week high of $91.97. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $96.50 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 1.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
SUZSuzano S.A.
Why now
Paper & Paper Products · market cap $10.8b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $11.54 — deep drawdown territory. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $12.57 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
Net margin 27% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 31% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BCC and SUZ diverge
On the headline score the gap is 17.6 points in favor of SUZ. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueBCC 24.1 · SUZ 98.1SUZ +74.0
- QualityBCC 50.0 · SUZ 61.9SUZ +11.9
- GrowthBCC 42.6 · SUZ 37.3BCC +5.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.