Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. STNG scored 38.9, OKE scored 58.3 — OKE leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. OKE's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but STNG's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
STNG
Scorpio Tankers Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream · Quality-Growth
38.9
$85.14 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
19.4
OKE leads
OKE
ONEOK, Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream · Quality-Growth
58.3
$89.80 · $56.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthOKE+40.8%
Strongest balance sheetSTNG0.20
Highest qualityOKE66 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueOKE-27%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
STNG
stronger →← stronger
OKE
53
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
66
29
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
38
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
60
OKE is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
STNG
OKE
-$81mF
FCF
$2.8bB
-24.6%F
Rev
+40.8%A
0.20A-
D/E
1.43C
4.5xC
P/S
—
2.46C
PEG
1.71C+
—
P/E
15.5xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
STNG
OKE
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
27% below
—
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~7%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
+5%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+38%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+105%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
STNG
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Diluting shareholders
OKE
Why this score
Cyclical growth
The companies
STNGScorpio Tankers Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream · $85.14 · beta -0.18
Why now
Oil & Gas Midstream · market cap $4.3b. 5% off the 52-week high of $90.06. Revenue -25% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $98.80 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
Net margin 37% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$81m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Revenue contracting -25% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
OKEONEOK, Inc.
Oil & Gas Midstream · $89.80 · beta 0.80
Why now
Oil & Gas Midstream · market cap $56.6b. 10% off the 52-week high of $99.85. Revenue growing +41% — in hypergrowth territory. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $101.20 (implying +13% upside).
Moat
ROE 16% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. $56.6b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Dividend payout 73% of earnings on a 4.7% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where STNG and OKE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 19.4 points in favor of OKE. The widest single difference is Value, where OKE leads by 22.0 points.
ValueSTNG 37.8 · OKE 59.8OKE +22.0
GrowthSTNG 29.3 · OKE 50.0OKE +20.7
QualitySTNG 52.8 · OKE 66.4OKE +13.6
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is OKE or STNG the better stock?
OKE scores higher: OKE 58.3, STNG 38.9 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do OKE and STNG differ most?
The widest gap is value, where OKE leads by 22 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. OKE leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are OKE and STNG scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.