COMPARE · Data as of August 13, 2026

LFTO vs STGW

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. LFTO scored 72.0, STGW scored 52.9 — LFTO leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. STGW's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but LFTO's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
LFTO
Liftoff Mobile, Inc.
Advertising Agencies · Quality-Growth
72
$20.06 · $3.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
19.1
LFTO leads
STGW
Stagwell Inc.
Advertising Agencies · Quality-Growth
52.9
$9.31 · $2.3B
fundamentals as of
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD72.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY76.3GROWTH94.2VALUE75.7
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD52.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY50.4GROWTH55.8VALUE52.6
LFTO
stronger →← stronger
STGW
76
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
50
94
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
56
76
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
LFTO is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
LFTO
STGW
$149mC
FCF
$253mC
+32.1%A
Rev
+6.4%C+
D/E
2.41C
154.3xD
P/E
155.2xD
0.35A
PEG
0.39A
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
LFTO
STGW
3% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
41% below
~14%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-5%/yr
-22%
1-yr DCF upside
+51%
+3%
5-yr DCF upside
+68%
+54%
10-yr DCF upside
+97%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
LFTO
Why this score
  • Short track record
STGW
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
LFTOLiftoff Mobile, Inc.
Advertising Agencies · $20.06
Why now
Advertising Agencies · market cap $3.4b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $30.10 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +32% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.35 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $35.46 (implying +77% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 154.3x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.0% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
STGWStagwell Inc.
Advertising Agencies · $9.31 · beta 1.22
Why now
Advertising Agencies · market cap $2.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $9.55 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.39 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $9.86 (implying +6% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 2.41 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trailing P/E 155.2x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Trading within 3% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where LFTO and STGW diverge

On the headline score the gap is 19.1 points in favour of LFTO. The widest single difference is Growth, where LFTO leads by 38.4 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.