COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
GEF-B vs SON
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GEF-B scored 54.3, SON scored 69.6 — SON leads.
Compare another set
GEF-B
Greif, Inc.
54.3
$111.43 · $4.2B
Score gap
15.3
SON leads
SON
Sonoco Products Company
69.6
$59.48 · $5.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestSON9.2x
- Fastest growthSON+31.2%
- Strongest balance sheetGEF-B0.39
- Highest qualitySON64 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GEF-B
stronger →← stronger
SON
59
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
64
57
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
64
48
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
83
SON is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GEF-B
SON
$188mC
FCF
$217mC
+4.3%C+
Rev
+31.2%A
0.39A-
D/E
1.32B
30.7xC
P/E
9.2xA
0.67A-
PEG
0.21A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GEF-B
SON
6% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
61% above
~8%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~18%/yr
-14%
1-yr DCF upside
-43%
-6%
5-yr DCF upside
-38%
+9%
10-yr DCF upside
-31%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GEF-B
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
SON
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
GEF-BGreif, Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $4.2b. Trading near 52-week high of $113.99 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.67 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Trailing P/E 31x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
SONSonoco Products Company
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $5.9b. Trading near 52-week high of $60.67 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +31% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.21 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $63.89 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GEF-B and SON diverge
On the headline score the gap is 15.3 points in favor of SON. The widest single difference is Value, where SON leads by 34.4 points.
- ValueGEF-B 48.2 · SON 82.6SON +34.4
- GrowthGEF-B 56.5 · SON 64.1SON +7.6
- QualityGEF-B 58.9 · SON 63.6SON +4.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.