COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

IOSP vs SOLS

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. IOSP scored 60.9, SOLS scored 55.2 — IOSP leads.
Compare another set
IOSP
Innospec Inc.
Specialty Chemicals · Quality-Growth
60.9
$93.63 · $2.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
5.7
IOSP leads
SOLS
Solstice Advanced Materials, Inc.
Specialty Chemicals · Quality-Growth
55.2
$56.16 · $8.9B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestIOSP19.1x
  • Fastest growthSOLS+9.2%
  • Strongest balance sheetIOSP0.04
  • Highest qualityIOSP65 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueIOSP-14%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD60.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY64.7GROWTH50.0VALUE69.8
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD55.2/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY51.3GROWTH50.0VALUE65.7
IOSPSOLSQuality64.751.3Growth50.050.0Value69.865.7
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-7%19%14x48xIOSPSOLS

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFIOSP$107mSOLS$195m
RevIOSP+2.9%SOLS+9.2%
D/EIOSP0.04SOLS1.53
P/EIOSP19.1xSOLS42.5x
PEGIOSP0.66SOLS0.64
IOSP
stronger →← stronger
SOLS
65
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
51
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
66
IOSP is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
IOSP
SOLS
$107mC
FCF
$195mC
+2.9%C
Rev
+9.2%B
0.04A
D/E
1.53D
19.1xB+
P/E
42.5xC
0.66A-
PEG
0.64A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
IOSP
SOLS
14% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
133% above
~10%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~32%/yr
-11%
1-yr DCF upside
-64%
+17%
5-yr DCF upside
-57%
+74%
10-yr DCF upside
-45%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
IOSP
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
  • Durable high returns
  • Cyclical growth
SOLS
Why this score
  • Cyclical growth
  • Short track record
IOSPInnospec Inc.
Specialty Chemicals · $93.63 · beta 0.91
Why now
Specialty Chemicals · market cap $2.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $95.01 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. PEG 0.66 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $101.00 (implying +8% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
SOLSSolstice Advanced Materials, Inc.
Specialty Chemicals · $56.16
Why now
Specialty Chemicals · market cap $8.9b. Down 38% from 52-week high of $90.80 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $80.43 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Down 38% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 43x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where IOSP and SOLS diverge

On the headline score the gap is 5.7 points in favor of IOSP. The widest single difference is Quality, where IOSP leads by 13.4 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.