COMPARE · Data as of October 9, 2026

SO vs NJR

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SO scored 51.4, NJR scored 65.0 — NJR leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. NJR's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but SO's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
SO
The Southern Company
Utilities - Regulated Electric · Quality-Growth
51.4
$86.17 · $99.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.6
NJR leads
NJR
New Jersey Resources Corporation
Utilities - Regulated Gas · Quality-Growth
65
$51.21 · $5.2B
fundamentals as of
  • Fastest growthSO+8.3%
  • Strongest balance sheetNJR1.47
  • Highest qualityNJR76 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueNJR-9%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD51.4/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY56.4GROWTH62.9VALUE38.3
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD65.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY76.4GROWTH56.1VALUE64.2
SONJRQuality56.476.4Growth62.956.1Value38.364.2
FCFSO-$3.5bNJR$359m
RevSO+8.3%NJR+7.0%
D/ESO1.82NJR1.47
PEGSO2.04NJR2.14
SO
stronger →← stronger
NJR
56
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
63
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
56
38
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
64
NJR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
SO
NJR
-$3.5bF
FCF
$359mC
+8.3%B
Rev
+7.0%C+
1.82C+
D/E
1.47B
3.3xC+
P/S
—
2.04C
PEG
2.14C
—
P/E
14.2xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
SO
NJR
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
9% below
—
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~3%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
+6%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+10%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+17%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
SO
Why this score
  • Durable high returns
  • Diluting shareholders
NJR
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
SOThe Southern Company
Utilities - Regulated Electric · $86.17 · beta 0.30
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $99.1b. 15% off the 52-week high of $100.84. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $98.13 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. $99.1b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$3.5b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
NJRNew Jersey Resources Corporation
Utilities - Regulated Gas · $51.21 · beta 0.50
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Gas · market cap $5.2b. 16% off the 52-week high of $60.86. 7 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $59.86 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
Net margin 24% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where SO and NJR diverge

On the headline score the gap is 13.6 points in favor of NJR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.

Common questions

Is NJR or SO the better stock?

NJR scores higher: NJR 65.0, SO 51.4 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

Where do NJR and SO differ most?

The widest gap is value, where NJR leads by 26 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.

How are NJR and SO scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.