COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026

NSIT vs SNX

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. NSIT scored 56.9, SNX scored 64.0 — SNX leads.
Compare another set
NSIT
Insight Enterprises, Inc.
Electronics & Computer Distribution · Quality-Growth
56.9
$154.67 · $4.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.1
SNX leads
SNX
TD SYNNEX Corporation
Electronics & Computer Distribution · Quality-Growth
64
$255.21 · $20.3B
fundamentals as of
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD56.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY70.3GROWTH51.6VALUE50.8
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD64.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY61.6GROWTH94.1VALUE45.3
NSIT
stronger →← stronger
SNX
70
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
52
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
94
51
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
45
NSIT is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
NSIT
SNX
$397mC
FCF
$375mC
+2.7%C
Rev
+16.3%B+
1.09C
D/E
0.53B
22.9xB+
P/E
18.2xA-
1.40B
PEG
0.90B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
NSIT
SNX
23% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
300% above
~-2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~47%/yr
+25%
1-yr DCF upside
-78%
+30%
5-yr DCF upside
-75%
+37%
10-yr DCF upside
-70%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
NSIT
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Durable high returns
SNX
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Raising its dividend
NSITInsight Enterprises, Inc.
Electronics & Computer Distribution · $154.67 · beta 1.07
Why now
Electronics & Computer Distribution · market cap $4.5b. Trading near 52-week high of $155.99 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $163.75 (implying +6% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 188% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Net margin 2.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
SNXTD SYNNEX Corporation
Electronics & Computer Distribution · $255.21 · beta 1.44
Why now
Electronics & Computer Distribution · market cap $20.3b. 14% off the 52-week high of $296.47. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.90 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $333.55 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Beta 1.44 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Net margin 1.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where NSIT and SNX diverge

On the headline score the gap is 7.1 points in favour of SNX. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.