COMPARE · Data as of August 12, 2026
CNXN vs SNX
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CNXN scored 44.2, SNX scored 64.0 — SNX leads.
Compare another set
CNXN
PC Connection, Inc.
44.2
$80.26 · $2.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
19.8
SNX leads
SNX
TD SYNNEX Corporation
64
$255.21 · $20.3B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CNXN
stronger →← stronger
SNX
62
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
62
56
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
94
25
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
45
SNX is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CNXN
SNX
$34mC-
FCF
$375mC
+3.2%C+
Rev
+16.3%B+
0.01A
D/E
0.53B
21.3xB+
P/E
18.2xA-
2.24C
PEG
0.90B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CNXN
SNX
231% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
300% above
~36%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~47%/yr
-71%
1-yr DCF upside
-78%
-70%
5-yr DCF upside
-75%
-67%
10-yr DCF upside
-70%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CNXN
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
SNX
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
CNXNPC Connection, Inc.
Why now
Electronics & Computer Distribution · market cap $2.0b. 9% off the 52-week high of $88.31.
Moat
ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Net margin 3.2% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
SNXTD SYNNEX Corporation
Why now
Electronics & Computer Distribution · market cap $20.3b. 14% off the 52-week high of $296.47. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.90 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $333.55 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Beta 1.44 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Net margin 1.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CNXN and SNX diverge
On the headline score the gap is 19.8 points in favour of SNX. The widest single difference is Growth, where SNX leads by 38.6 points.
- GrowthCNXN 55.5 · SNX 94.1SNX +38.6
- ValueCNXN 25.0 · SNX 45.3SNX +20.3
- QualityCNXN 62.2 · SNX 61.6level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.