Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SNX scored 64.6, ARW scored 66.4 — ARW leads.
Compare another set
SNX
TD SYNNEX Corporation
Electronics & Computer Distribution · Quality-Growth
64.6
$273.37 · $21.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.8
ARW leads
ARW
Arrow Electronics, Inc.
Electronics & Computer Distribution · Quality-Growth
66.4
$227.90 · $11.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthARW+26.1%
Strongest balance sheetARW0.31
Highest qualitySNX60 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueARW-8%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
SNX
stronger →← stronger
ARW
60
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
57
93
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
78
48
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
66
SNX is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
SNX
ARW
-$815mF
FCF
$825mC+
+24.1%A-
Rev
+26.1%A-
0.65C+
D/E
0.31B
0.3xA
P/S
—
0.52A-
PEG
0.95B+
—
P/E
14.6xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
SNX
ARW
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
8% below
—
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-1%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+8%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+22%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
SNX
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
ARW
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
SNXTD SYNNEX Corporation
Electronics & Computer Distribution · $273.37 · beta 1.37
Why now
Electronics & Computer Distribution · market cap $21.8b. 9% off the 52-week high of $298.77. Revenue growing +24%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.52 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $339.64 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$815m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Net margin 1.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
ARWArrow Electronics, Inc.
Electronics & Computer Distribution · $227.90 · beta 1.17
Why now
Electronics & Computer Distribution · market cap $11.6b. 9% off the 52-week high of $249.43. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.95 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $235.00 (implying +3% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 102% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Net margin 2.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
SNX leads ARW by 1.4 points (63.6 to 62.2), its sharpest advantage coming in PEG (grade A). A contrarian could still prefer ARW, which trades about 5% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where SNX and ARW diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.8 points in favor of ARW. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueSNX 48.3 · ARW 66.4ARW +18.1
GrowthSNX 92.6 · ARW 77.8SNX +14.8
QualitySNX 60.4 · ARW 56.6SNX +3.8
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is ARW or SNX the better stock?
ARW scores higher: ARW 66.4, SNX 64.6 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do ARW and SNX differ most?
The widest gap is value, where ARW leads by 18 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are ARW and SNX scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.