COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
SLGN vs SON
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SLGN scored 59.8, SON scored 70.7 — SON leads.
Compare another set
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
59.8
$41.09 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.9
SON leads
SON
Sonoco Products Company
70.7
$56.78 · $5.6B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
SLGN
stronger →← stronger
SON
54
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
63
74
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
67
54
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
84
SON is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
SLGN
SON
$307mC
FCF
$217mC
+9.6%B
Rev
+31.2%A
2.01C
D/E
1.31C+
15.4xA-
P/E
8.8xA
0.79A-
PEG
0.21A
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
SLGN
SON
36% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
54% above
~-5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~17%/yr
+48%
1-yr DCF upside
-40%
+57%
5-yr DCF upside
-35%
+71%
10-yr DCF upside
-28%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
SLGN
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
SON
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $4.3b. 17% off the 52-week high of $49.55. PEG 0.79 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.77 (implying +33% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 108% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.01 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 4.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
SONSonoco Products Company
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $5.6b. 6% off the 52-week high of $60.67. Revenue growing +31% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.21 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $63.78 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.