COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CCK vs SLGN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CCK scored 75.4, SLGN scored 59.1 — CCK leads.
Compare another set
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
75.4
$119.47 · $13.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
16.3
CCK leads
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
59.1
$42.39 · $4.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestSLGN16.6x
- Fastest growthCCK+10.3%
- Strongest balance sheetCCK1.86
- Highest qualityCCK77 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCCK-56%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CCK
stronger →← stronger
SLGN
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
54
75
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
72
74
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
CCK is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CCK
SLGN
$1.2bC+
FCF
$343mC
+10.3%B
Rev
+8.4%B
1.86C+
D/E
2.03C+
17.2xB+
P/E
16.6xB+
0.64A-
PEG
0.79A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CCK
SLGN
56% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
40% below
~-13%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
+112%
1-yr DCF upside
+57%
+126%
5-yr DCF upside
+66%
+148%
10-yr DCF upside
+80%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CCK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
SLGN
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
CCKCrown Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $13.0b. Trading near 52-week high of $122.91 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.64 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $136.57 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 153% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 3% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $4.5b. 14% off the 52-week high of $49.55. PEG 0.79 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $55.31 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.03 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 4.0% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CCK and SLGN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 16.3 points in favor of CCK. The widest single difference is Quality, where CCK leads by 23.3 points.
- QualityCCK 77.0 · SLGN 53.7CCK +23.3
- ValueCCK 73.9 · SLGN 53.2CCK +20.7
- GrowthCCK 75.4 · SLGN 72.3CCK +3.1
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.