COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

BALL vs SLGN

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BALL scored 60.3, SLGN scored 59.1 — BALL leads.
Compare another set
BALL
Ball Corporation
Packaging & Containers · Quality-Growth
60.3
$63.59 · $16.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.2
BALL leads
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
Packaging & Containers · Quality-Growth
59.1
$42.39 · $4.5B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestSLGN16.6x
  • Fastest growthBALL+15.6%
  • Strongest balance sheetBALL1.31
  • Highest qualityBALL63 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueSLGN-40%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD60.3/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY62.7GROWTH74.4VALUE47.0
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD59.1/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY53.7GROWTH72.3VALUE53.2
BALLSLGNQuality62.753.7Growth74.472.3Value47.053.2
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-2%26%12x23xBALLSLGN

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFBALL$827mSLGN$343m
RevBALL+15.6%SLGN+8.4%
D/EBALL1.31SLGN2.03
P/EBALL18.2xSLGN16.6x
PEGBALL1.21SLGN0.79
BALL
stronger →← stronger
SLGN
63
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
54
74
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
72
47
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
BALL is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
BALL
SLGN
$827mC+
FCF
$343mC
+15.6%B+
Rev
+8.4%B
1.31B
D/E
2.03C+
18.2xB
P/E
16.6xB+
1.21B
PEG
0.79A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
BALL
SLGN
9% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
40% below
~10%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
-18%
1-yr DCF upside
+57%
-8%
5-yr DCF upside
+66%
+10%
10-yr DCF upside
+80%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
BALL
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Durable high returns
SLGN
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
BALLBall Corporation
Packaging & Containers · $63.59 · beta 0.96
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $16.8b. 7% off the 52-week high of $68.29. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. 14 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $72.57 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
Packaging & Containers · $42.39 · beta 0.68
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $4.5b. 14% off the 52-week high of $49.55. PEG 0.79 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $55.31 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.03 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 4.0% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where BALL and SLGN diverge

On the headline score the gap is 1.2 points in favor of BALL. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.