COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AVY vs SLGN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AVY scored 62.8, SLGN scored 59.1 — AVY leads.
Compare another set
AVY
Avery Dennison Corporation
62.8
$183.71 · $13.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.7
AVY leads
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
59.1
$42.39 · $4.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestSLGN16.6x
- Fastest growthSLGN+8.4%
- Strongest balance sheetAVY1.59
- Highest qualityAVY74 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueSLGN-40%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AVY
stronger →← stronger
SLGN
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
54
67
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
72
50
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
SLGN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AVY
SLGN
$1.1bC+
FCF
$343mC
+5.8%C+
Rev
+8.4%B
1.59C+
D/E
2.03C+
20.1xB
P/E
16.6xB+
1.92C+
PEG
0.79A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AVY
SLGN
35% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
40% below
~-3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
+41%
1-yr DCF upside
+57%
+54%
5-yr DCF upside
+66%
+76%
10-yr DCF upside
+80%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AVY
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
SLGN
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
AVYAvery Dennison Corporation
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $13.9b. 8% off the 52-week high of $199.54. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $201.80 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
ROE 30% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 151% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $4.5b. 14% off the 52-week high of $49.55. PEG 0.79 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $55.31 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.03 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 4.0% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AVY and SLGN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.7 points in favor of AVY. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityAVY 73.7 · SLGN 53.7AVY +20.0
- GrowthAVY 67.2 · SLGN 72.3SLGN +5.1
- ValueAVY 49.9 · SLGN 53.2SLGN +3.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.