COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AMCR vs SLGN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AMCR scored 67.9, SLGN scored 59.1 — AMCR leads.
Compare another set
AMCR
Amcor plc
67.9
$48.59 · $22.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.8
AMCR leads
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
59.1
$42.39 · $4.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestSLGN16.6x
- Fastest growthAMCR+56.6%
- Strongest balance sheetAMCR1.28
- Highest qualityAMCR54 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueSLGN-40%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AMCR
stronger →← stronger
SLGN
54
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
54
89
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
72
64
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
AMCR is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AMCR
SLGN
$1.2bC+
FCF
$343mC
+56.6%A
Rev
+8.4%B
1.28B
D/E
2.03C+
20.4xB
P/E
16.6xB+
1.07B+
PEG
0.79A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AMCR
SLGN
23% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
40% below
~-1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
+23%
1-yr DCF upside
+57%
+30%
5-yr DCF upside
+66%
+40%
10-yr DCF upside
+80%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AMCR
No notable signals flagged.
SLGN
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
AMCRAmcor plc
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $22.5b. 5% off the 52-week high of $50.94. Revenue growing +57% — in hypergrowth territory. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $49.93 (implying +3% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 111% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Dividend payout 109% of earnings on a 5.5% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 4.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
Why now
Packaging & Containers · market cap $4.5b. 14% off the 52-week high of $49.55. PEG 0.79 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $55.31 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.03 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 4.0% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AMCR and SLGN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.8 points in favor of AMCR. The widest single difference is Growth, where AMCR leads by 17.1 points.
- GrowthAMCR 89.4 · SLGN 72.3AMCR +17.1
- ValueAMCR 64.4 · SLGN 53.2AMCR +11.2
- QualityAMCR 54.4 · SLGN 53.7level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.