Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SLG scored 73.0, BXP scored 69.0 — SLG leads.
Compare another set
SLG
SL Green Realty Corp.
REIT - Office · Financial strength
70Fin
$48.91 · $3.8B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
1.3
SLG leads
BXP
BXP, Inc.
REIT - Office · Financial strength
68.7Fin
$57.93 · $10.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthSLG+8.4%
Strongest balance sheetSLG1.43
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
SLG
BXP
5.1%A-
Yield
4.7%B+
+8.4%B
Rev
+2.2%C
1.43C+
D/E
2.12C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
SLGSL Green Realty Corp.
REIT - Office · $48.91 · beta 1.66
Why now
REIT - Office · market cap $3.8b. 19% off the 52-week high of $60.09. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $58.50 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -16.7%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Beta 1.66 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Dividend payout 15375% of earnings on a 5.1% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
BXPBXP, Inc.
REIT - Office · $57.93 · beta 1.05
Why now
REIT - Office · market cap $10.5b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $74.96 — deep drawdown territory. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $75.95 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
D/E 2.12 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Dividend payout 151% of earnings on a 4.7% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE 5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is SLG or BXP the better stock?
SLG scores higher: SLG 73.0, BXP 69.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are SLG and BXP scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.