Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SLF scored 73.0, BRK-B scored 65.0 — SLF leads.
Compare another set
SLF
Sun Life Financial Inc.
Insurance - Diversified · Financial strength
59.1Fin
$77.87 · $43.3B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
7.0
BRK-B leads
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
Insurance - Diversified · Financial strength
66.1Fin
$520.59 · $1.1T
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestBRK-B13.1x
Fastest growthSLF+11.5%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
SLF
BRK-B
+11.5%B
Rev
-3.2%D+
18.2xC
P/E
13.1xB
13.1%B
ROE
12.1%B
2.45C+
P/B
0.00A
3.5%B+
Yield
0.0%C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
SLFSun Life Financial Inc.
Insurance - Diversified · $77.87 · beta 0.79
Why now
Insurance - Diversified · market cap $43.3b. 8% off the 52-week high of $84.38. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Financial moat — scale of deposit base / underwriting franchise plus regulatory capital advantages. The largest players compound book value through cycles that erase smaller competitors.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
BRK-BBerkshire Hathaway Inc.
Insurance - Diversified · $520.59 · beta 0.59
Why now
Insurance - Diversified · market cap $1.1T. 3% off the 52-week high of $537.74. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $547.67 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
Net margin 22% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. $1.1T market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Balance-sheet financial — book value, net interest margin, and credit loss provisions are the lever points; a rates regime change or a deterioration in the loan book moves the stock more than EPS does.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is SLF or BRK-B the better stock?
SLF scores higher: SLF 73.0, BRK-B 65.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are SLF and BRK-B scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.