COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
NVDA vs SKHY
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. NVDA scored 86.0, SKHY scored 72.0 — NVDA leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. NVDA's fundamentals are as of July 2026, but SKHY's are as of March 2026 — a 4-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
86
$217.55 · $5.3T
fundamentals as of
Score gap
14.0
NVDA leads
SKHY
SK hynix Inc.
72
$161.04 · $1.1T
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestSKHY9.8x
- Fastest growthNVDA+83.4%
- Strongest balance sheetNVDA0.07
- Highest qualitySKHY92 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
NVDA
stronger →← stronger
SKHY
88
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
92
100
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
98
73
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
80
SKHY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
NVDA
SKHY
$127.0bA
FCF
$29.5bA
+83.4%A
Rev
+46.8%A
0.07A-
D/E
0.08B+
27.5xB
P/E
9.8xA
0.59A-
PEG
0.31A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
NVDA
SKHY
207% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
188% above
~48%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~46%/yr
-75%
1-yr DCF upside
-73%
-67%
5-yr DCF upside
-65%
-54%
10-yr DCF upside
-51%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
NVDA
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
SKHY
Why this score
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (KRW)
The companies
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
Why now
Semiconductors · market cap $5.3T. 8% off the 52-week high of $236.54. Revenue growing +83% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.59 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 58 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $305.79 (implying +41% upside).
Moat
Net margin 64% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 84% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $5.3T market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Beta 2.21 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. P/S 17.3x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard. Semiconductor cyclicality — inventory corrections compress margins faster than analysts model. Monitor channel inventory and book-to-bill ratios as leading indicators.
SKHYSK hynix Inc.
Why now
Semiconductors · market cap $1.1T. 17% off the 52-week high of $194.80. Revenue growing +47% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.31 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $246.97 (implying +53% upside).
Moat
Net margin 86% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 93% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $1.1T market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Beta 2.40 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Semiconductor cyclicality — inventory corrections compress margins faster than analysts model. Monitor channel inventory and book-to-bill ratios as leading indicators.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
NVDA leads SKHY by 14 points (86.0 to 72.0). A contrarian could still prefer SKHY for its stronger P/E (grade A-). Note they play different roles — NVDA screens as growth, SKHY screens as value — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where NVDA and SKHY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 14.0 points in favor of NVDA. The widest single difference is Value, where SKHY leads by 7.2 points.
- ValueNVDA 72.7 · SKHY 79.9SKHY +7.2
- QualityNVDA 87.8 · SKHY 91.5SKHY +3.7
- GrowthNVDA 99.7 · SKHY 97.5level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.