COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
POOL vs SITE
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. POOL scored 60.8, SITE scored 64.7 — SITE leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. SITE's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but POOL's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
POOL
Pool Corporation
60.8
$187.98 · $6.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.9
SITE leads
SITE
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
64.7
$95.94 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestPOOL17.5x
- Fastest growthSITE+3.6%
- Strongest balance sheetSITE0.67
- Highest qualityPOOL78 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueSITE-3%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
POOL
stronger →← stronger
SITE
78
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
56
42
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
63
69
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
76
SITE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
POOL
SITE
$313mC
FCF
$250mC
+1.8%C
Rev
+3.6%C+
1.35C
D/E
0.67B
17.5xA-
P/E
26.3xB
1.60C+
PEG
1.21B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
POOL
SITE
40% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
3% below
~14%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~12%/yr
-33%
1-yr DCF upside
-18%
-29%
5-yr DCF upside
+3%
-23%
10-yr DCF upside
+42%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
POOL
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
SITE
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
POOLPool Corporation
Why now
Industrial Distribution · market cap $6.8b. Down 44% from 52-week high of $336.15 — deep drawdown territory. 11 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $220.36 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
ROE 36% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 44% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
SITESiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
Why now
Industrial Distribution · market cap $4.2b. Down 43% from 52-week high of $168.56 — deep drawdown territory. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $127.08 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 154% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 43% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 3.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where POOL and SITE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.9 points in favor of SITE. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthPOOL 42.0 · SITE 63.4SITE +21.4
- QualityPOOL 77.6 · SITE 56.4POOL +21.2
- ValuePOOL 68.9 · SITE 75.9SITE +7.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.