Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SHOO scored 67.7, KTB scored 80.0 — KTB leads.
Compare another set
SHOO
Steven Madden, Ltd.
Footwear & Accessories · Quality-Growth
67.7
$44.30 · $3.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.3
KTB leads
KTB
Kontoor Brands, Inc.
Apparel Manufacturing · Quality-Growth
80
$65.62 · $3.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestKTB16.0x
Fastest growthKTB+34.3%
Strongest balance sheetSHOO0.39
Highest qualityKTB81 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueKTB-53%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
SHOO
stronger →← stronger
KTB
70
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
81
90
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
79
49
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
80
KTB is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
SHOO
KTB
$224mC
FCF
$422mC
+18.2%B+
Rev
+34.3%A
0.39A-
D/E
2.06C
22.1xC+
P/E
16.0xB+
2.17C
PEG
1.89C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
SHOO
KTB
18% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
53% below
~6%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-11%/yr
+2%
1-yr DCF upside
+99%
+22%
5-yr DCF upside
+112%
+58%
10-yr DCF upside
+131%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
SHOO
No notable signals flagged.
KTB
Why this score
Durable high returns
The companies
SHOOSteven Madden, Ltd.
Footwear & Accessories · $44.30 · beta 1.18
Why now
Footwear & Accessories · market cap $3.2b. 11% off the 52-week high of $49.70. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $52.40 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
ROE 15% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 157% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
KTBKontoor Brands, Inc.
Apparel Manufacturing · $65.62 · beta 0.90
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $3.6b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $88.96 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +34% — in hypergrowth territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $97.50 (implying +49% upside).
Moat
ROE 43% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 158% of net income, helped by cash released from working capital ($123m) that doesn't repeat every year.
Risk
D/E 2.06 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where SHOO and KTB diverge
On the headline score the gap is 12.3 points in favor of KTB. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueSHOO 49.2 · KTB 80.4KTB +31.2
GrowthSHOO 89.7 · KTB 78.7SHOO +11.0
QualitySHOO 70.4 · KTB 80.8KTB +10.4
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is KTB or SHOO the better stock?
KTB scores higher: KTB 80.0, SHOO 67.7 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do KTB and SHOO differ most?
The widest gap is value, where KTB leads by 31 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are KTB and SHOO scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.