COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
SHAK vs YETI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SHAK scored 47.7, YETI scored 67.8 — YETI leads.
Compare another set
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.
47.7
$75.44 · $3.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
20.1
YETI leads
YETI
YETI Holdings, Inc.
67.8
$43.08 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthSHAK+17.3%
- Strongest balance sheetYETI0.42
- Highest qualityYETI89 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
SHAK
stronger →← stronger
YETI
46
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
89
91
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
26
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
70
YETI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
SHAK
YETI
-$12mF
FCF
$257mC
+17.3%B+
Rev
+6.2%C+
1.67C+
D/E
0.42A-
2.1xC+
P/S
—
3.24D
PEG
1.27B
—
P/E
19.2xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
SHAK
YETI
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
4% above
—
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~10%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-15%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-4%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+13%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
SHAK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
YETI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
The companies
SHAKShake Shack Inc.
Why now
Restaurants · market cap $3.2b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $107.49 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. 23 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $82.17 (implying +9% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$12m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 80.3x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Beta 1.66 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
YETIYETI Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Leisure · market cap $3.1b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $53.99 — deep drawdown territory. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.53 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
ROE 29% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 144% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Beta 1.72 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where SHAK and YETI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 20.1 points in favor of YETI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueSHAK 25.8 · YETI 69.6YETI +43.8
- QualitySHAK 46.2 · YETI 89.4YETI +43.2
- GrowthSHAK 91.4 · YETI 50.0SHAK +41.4
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.