At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestTILE14.1x
Fastest growthSGI+27.1%
Strongest balance sheetTILE0.43
Highest qualityTILE77 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueSGI-4%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
SGI
stronger →← stronger
TILE
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
90
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
63
49
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
64
TILE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
SGI
TILE
$769mC+
FCF
$124mC
+27.1%A-
Rev
+6.5%C+
1.98C+
D/E
0.43B+
24.8xC+
P/E
14.1xB+
0.83B+
PEG
0.95B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
SGI
TILE
4% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
72% above
~14%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~19%/yr
-19%
1-yr DCF upside
-43%
+5%
5-yr DCF upside
-42%
+52%
10-yr DCF upside
-41%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances · market cap $14.3b. Down 37% from 52-week high of $98.56 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +27% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.83 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 9 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $93.44 (implying +50% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 144% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 37% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances · market cap $2.0b. 14% off the 52-week high of $40.50. PEG 0.95 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $45.25 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 21% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Beta 2.00 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where SGI and TILE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.0 points in favor of SGI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
GrowthSGI 90.0 · TILE 62.6SGI +27.4
ValueSGI 49.3 · TILE 64.0TILE +14.7
QualitySGI 72.6 · TILE 76.7TILE +4.1
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is SGI or TILE the better stock?
SGI scores higher: SGI 68.5, TILE 67.5 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do SGI and TILE differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where SGI leads by 27 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are SGI and TILE scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.