Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SEIC scored 77.0, MAIN scored 72.0 — SEIC leads.
Compare another set
SEIC
SEI Investments Company
Asset Management · Financial strength
71.5Fin
$105.09 · $12.6B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
14.0
MAIN leads
MAIN
Main Street Capital Corporation
Asset Management · Financial strength
85.5Fin
$53.77 · $5.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestMAIN10.8x
Fastest growthSEIC+8.1%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
SEIC
MAIN
+8.1%B
Rev
-1.6%D+
18.5xC
P/E
10.8xB+
27.6%A-
ROE
14.3%B
5.04D
P/B
1.58B
1.0%C
Yield
5.9%A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
SEICSEI Investments Company
Asset Management · $105.09 · beta 0.97
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $12.6b. 6% off the 52-week high of $112.15. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $117.50 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Credit-cycle exposure — provisions tend to lag actual loan deterioration by 2-3 quarters; a sharp uptick in net charge-offs is a leading indicator the market often misses until it's already priced.
MAINMain Street Capital Corporation
Asset Management · $53.77 · beta 0.75
Why now
Asset Management · market cap $5.0b. 18% off the 52-week high of $65.23. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $59.86 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 78% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Dividend payout 86% of earnings on a 5.9% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Regulatory capital risk — stricter capital requirements (CCAR, Basel) can force a dividend cut or a capital raise; the largest banks are most exposed because they're held to the tightest standards.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is SEIC or MAIN the better stock?
SEIC scores higher: SEIC 77.0, MAIN 72.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are SEIC and MAIN scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.