COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
FTI vs SEI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. FTI scored 54.8, SEI scored 42.9 — FTI leads.
Compare another set
FTI
TechnipFMC plc
54.8
$77.45 · $30.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
11.9
FTI leads
SEI
Solaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.
42.9
$53.28 · $5.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthSEI+105.9%
- Strongest balance sheetFTI0.38
- Highest qualityFTI87 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueFTI-21%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
FTI
stronger →← stronger
SEI
87
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
40
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
38
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
40
FTI and SEI split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
FTI
SEI
$1.6bC+
FCF
-$728mF
+9.9%B
Rev
+105.9%A
0.38B+
D/E
2.17D
27.1xC+
P/E
—
2.18C
PEG
0.94B+
—
P/S
17.9xD
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
FTI
SEI
21% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
—
~4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
—
+7%
1-yr DCF upside
—
+26%
5-yr DCF upside
—
+60%
10-yr DCF upside
—
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
FTI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Cyclical growth
SEI
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
The companies
FTITechnipFMC plc
Why now
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · market cap $30.4b. 4% off the 52-week high of $80.55. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $75.81 (implying -2% upside).
Moat
ROE 36% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 134% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Reserve-replacement treadmill — every barrel or ounce extracted has to be replaced through exploration or acquisition; underspending on replacement reserves shows up in production declines 2-3 years out.
SEISolaris Energy Infrastructure, Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services · market cap $5.4b. Down 38% from 52-week high of $86.19 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +106% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.94 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $94.41 (implying +77% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent.
Risk
D/E 2.17 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$728m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 67.4x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where FTI and SEI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 11.9 points in favor of FTI. The widest single difference is Quality, where FTI leads by 47.5 points.
- QualityFTI 87.3 · SEI 39.8FTI +47.5
- ValueFTI 37.7 · SEI 39.8level
- GrowthFTI 50.0 · SEI 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.