Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SEDG scored 28.7, ENPH scored 43.4 — ENPH leads.
Compare another set
SEDG
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
Solar · Quality-Growth
28.7
$32.21 · $2.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
14.7
ENPH leads
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.
Solar · Quality-Growth
43.4
$32.81 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthSEDG+41.6%
Strongest balance sheetENPH0.52
Highest qualityENPH51 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
SEDG
stronger →← stronger
ENPH
24
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
51
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
20
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
32
ENPH is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
SEDG
ENPH
$90mC-
FCF
$153mC
+41.6%A
Rev
+10.7%B
0.99C
D/E
0.52B
1.5xA-
P/S
—
4.61D
PEG
—
—
P/E
32.8xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
SEDG
ENPH
29% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
147% above
~22%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~33%/yr
-40%
1-yr DCF upside
-63%
-22%
5-yr DCF upside
-60%
+11%
10-yr DCF upside
-55%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
SEDG
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
Cyclical growth
ENPH
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
SEDGSolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
Solar · $32.21 · beta 1.44
Why now
Solar · market cap $2.0b. Down 60% from 52-week high of $81.25 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +42% — in hypergrowth territory. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $38.16 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -20.3%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 60% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.44 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
ENPHEnphase Energy, Inc.
Solar · $32.81 · beta 1.63
Why now
Solar · market cap $4.3b. Down 56% from 52-week high of $73.74 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 26 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $51.13 (implying +56% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 114% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 56% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.63 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where SEDG and ENPH diverge
On the headline score the gap is 14.7 points in favor of ENPH. The widest single difference is Quality, where ENPH leads by 27.7 points.
QualitySEDG 23.6 · ENPH 51.3ENPH +27.7
ValueSEDG 19.9 · ENPH 32.1ENPH +12.2
GrowthSEDG 50.0 · ENPH 49.6level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is ENPH or SEDG the better stock?
ENPH scores higher: ENPH 43.4, SEDG 28.7 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do ENPH and SEDG differ most?
The widest gap is quality, where ENPH leads by 28 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. ENPH also leads value, while growth is effectively level between them.
How are ENPH and SEDG scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.