Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SEB scored 58.2, BBUC scored 31.3 — SEB leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. SEB's fundamentals are as of July 2026, but BBUC's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
SEB
Seaboard Corporation
Conglomerates · Quality-Growth
58.2
$3,976.00 · $3.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
26.9
SEB leads
BBUC
Brookfield Business Corporation
Conglomerates · Quality-Growth
31.3
$26.67 · $5.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestBBUC0.2x
Fastest growthSEB+8.2%
Strongest balance sheetSEB0.36
Highest qualitySEB46 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueBBUC-49%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/S multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
SEB
stronger →← stronger
BBUC
46
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
31
60
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
14
71
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
70
SEB is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
SEB
BBUC
-$23mF
FCF
$1.2bC+
+8.2%B
Rev
-32.4%F
0.36B+
D/E
2.96D
0.4xA
P/S
0.2xA
0.65A-
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
SEB
BBUC
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
49% below
—
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-18%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
+121%
—
5-yr DCF upside
+98%
—
10-yr DCF upside
+71%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
SEB
BBUC
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
The companies
SEBSeaboard Corporation
Conglomerates · $3,976.00 · beta 0.21
Why now
Conglomerates · market cap $3.8b. Down 34% from 52-week high of $5989.37 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.65 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$23m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Down 34% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
BBUCBrookfield Business Corporation
Conglomerates · $26.67 · beta 1.39
Why now
Conglomerates · market cap $5.5b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $38.25 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue -32% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $39.00 (implying +46% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income.
Risk
D/E 2.96 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Revenue contracting -32% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where SEB and BBUC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 26.9 points in favor of SEB. The widest single difference is Growth, where SEB leads by 45.6 points.
GrowthSEB 59.7 · BBUC 14.1SEB +45.6
QualitySEB 46.3 · BBUC 31.1SEB +15.2
ValueSEB 71.3 · BBUC 69.9level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is SEB or BBUC the better stock?
SEB scores higher: SEB 58.2, BBUC 31.3 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do SEB and BBUC differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where SEB leads by 46 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. SEB also leads quality, while value is effectively level between them.
How are SEB and BBUC scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.