COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
SBUX vs YETI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. SBUX scored 47.4, YETI scored 67.8 — YETI leads.
Compare another set
SBUX
Starbucks Corporation
47.4
$107.49 · $122.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
20.4
YETI leads
YETI
YETI Holdings, Inc.
67.8
$43.08 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestYETI19.2x
- Fastest growthYETI+6.2%
- Highest qualityYETI89 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
SBUX
stronger →← stronger
YETI
58
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
89
66
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
28
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
70
YETI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
SBUX
YETI
$3.6bB
FCF
$257mC
+4.5%C+
Rev
+6.2%C+
—
D/E
0.42A-
61.8xD
P/E
19.2xB
1.30B
PEG
1.27B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
SBUX
YETI
53% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
4% above
~23%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~10%/yr
-48%
1-yr DCF upside
-15%
-35%
5-yr DCF upside
-4%
-10%
10-yr DCF upside
+13%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
SBUX
YETI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
The companies
SBUXStarbucks Corporation
Why now
Restaurants · market cap $122.5b. Trading near 52-week high of $110.51 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 31 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $112.23 (implying +4% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 184% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $122.5b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Trailing P/E 61.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Trading within 3% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. ROE -26% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
YETIYETI Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Leisure · market cap $3.1b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $53.99 — deep drawdown territory. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.53 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
ROE 29% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 144% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Beta 1.72 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where SBUX and YETI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 20.4 points in favor of YETI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueSBUX 27.7 · YETI 69.6YETI +41.9
- QualitySBUX 57.9 · YETI 89.4YETI +31.5
- GrowthSBUX 66.2 · YETI 50.0SBUX +16.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.