COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CHKP vs SAIL
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CHKP scored 76.9, SAIL scored 49.4 — CHKP leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. SAIL's fundamentals are as of April 2026, but CHKP's are as of December 2025 — a 4-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CHKP
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
76.9
$130.55 · $13.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
27.5
CHKP leads
SAIL
SailPoint, Inc.
49.4
$18.64 · $10.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthSAIL+24.0%
- Strongest balance sheetSAIL0.00
- Highest qualityCHKP89 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCHKP-31%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CHKP
stronger →← stronger
SAIL
89
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
40
68
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
91
75
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
33
CHKP is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CHKP
SAIL
$1.2bC+
FCF
$201mC
+6.3%C+
Rev
+24.0%A-
0.72C+
D/E
0.00A
13.4xA
P/E
—
1.29B
PEG
—
—
P/S
9.4xC
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CHKP
SAIL
31% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
130% above
~-3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~36%/yr
+36%
1-yr DCF upside
-66%
+46%
5-yr DCF upside
-56%
+61%
10-yr DCF upside
-36%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CHKP
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
SAIL
Why this score
- Short track record
The companies
CHKPCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $13.3b. Down 38% from 52-week high of $210.66 — deep drawdown territory. 31 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $146.32 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
Net margin 39% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 37% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 111% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 38% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
SAILSailPoint, Inc.
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $10.6b. Down 22% from 52-week high of $24.00 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +24%, comfortably above the S&P median. 25 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $19.86 (implying +7% upside).
Moat
Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -14.0%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -2% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CHKP and SAIL diverge
On the headline score the gap is 27.5 points in favor of CHKP. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityCHKP 88.7 · SAIL 40.0CHKP +48.7
- ValueCHKP 75.3 · SAIL 33.0CHKP +42.3
- GrowthCHKP 68.1 · SAIL 91.4SAIL +23.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.