COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
RVLV vs W
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. RVLV scored 65.9, W scored 26.7 — RVLV leads.
Compare another set
RVLV
Revolve Group, Inc.
65.9
$23.96 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
39.2
RVLV leads
W
Wayfair Inc.
26.7
$103.19 · $14.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthRVLV+10.8%
- Highest qualityRVLV61 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
RVLV
stronger →← stronger
W
61
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
46
76
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
43
62
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
10
RVLV is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
RVLV
W
$28mC-
FCF
$562mC+
+10.8%B
Rev
+7.5%B
0.06A
D/E
—
23.3xB
P/E
—
1.08B+
PEG
23.50D
—
P/S
1.1xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
RVLV
W
299% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
7% above
~55%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~16%/yr
-81%
1-yr DCF upside
-29%
-75%
5-yr DCF upside
-7%
-64%
10-yr DCF upside
+40%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
RVLV
No notable signals flagged.
W
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
RVLVRevolve Group, Inc.
Why now
Internet Retail · market cap $1.7b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $31.68 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $30.85 (implying +29% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Beta 1.64 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. E-commerce competition — Amazon, Walmart, Shein, and Temu have each forced the rest of the category to compete on price, fulfillment speed, or assortment; sustaining margins requires one of those being structurally defended.
WWayfair Inc.
Why now
Internet Retail · market cap $14.1b. 14% off the 52-week high of $119.98. 29 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $123.31 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -2.5%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Beta 2.98 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. E-commerce competition — Amazon, Walmart, Shein, and Temu have each forced the rest of the category to compete on price, fulfillment speed, or assortment; sustaining margins requires one of those being structurally defended.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where RVLV and W diverge
On the headline score the gap is 39.2 points in favor of RVLV. The widest single difference is Value, where RVLV leads by 52.0 points.
- ValueRVLV 61.7 · W 9.7RVLV +52.0
- GrowthRVLV 75.6 · W 42.5RVLV +33.1
- QualityRVLV 61.4 · W 46.4RVLV +15.0
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.