COMPARE · Data as of August 14, 2026
CHWY vs RVLV
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CHWY scored 69.3, RVLV scored 66.1 — CHWY leads.
Compare another set
CHWY
Chewy, Inc.
69.3
$22.42 · $9.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
3.2
CHWY leads
RVLV
Revolve Group, Inc.
66.1
$23.69 · $1.7B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CHWY
stronger →← stronger
RVLV
76
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
61
56
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
79
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
62
CHWY is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CHWY
RVLV
$585mC+
FCF
$28mC-
+6.1%C+
Rev
+10.8%B
1.23B
D/E
0.06A
37.4xC
P/E
23.2xC+
0.45A
PEG
1.08B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CHWY
RVLV
1% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
294% above
~12%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~55%/yr
-18%
1-yr DCF upside
-80%
+1%
5-yr DCF upside
-75%
+35%
10-yr DCF upside
-64%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CHWY
Why this score
- Durable high returns
RVLV
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
CHWYChewy, Inc.
Why now
Internet Retail · market cap $9.2b. Down 48% from 52-week high of $43.50 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.45 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 21 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $31.05 (implying +38% upside).
Moat
ROE 60% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Down 48% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.42 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 37x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
RVLVRevolve Group, Inc.
Why now
Internet Retail · market cap $1.7b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $31.68 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $30.85 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Beta 1.64 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. E-commerce competition — Amazon, Walmart, Shein, and Temu have each forced the rest of the category to compete on price, fulfillment speed, or assortment; sustaining margins requires one of those being structurally defended.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CHWY and RVLV diverge
On the headline score the gap is 3.2 points in favor of CHWY. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCHWY 55.7 · RVLV 75.6RVLV +19.9
- ValueCHWY 78.9 · RVLV 62.3CHWY +16.6
- QualityCHWY 75.7 · RVLV 61.4CHWY +14.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.