COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
EXPE vs RSI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EXPE scored 67.9, RSI scored 54.5 — EXPE leads.
Compare another set
EXPE
Expedia Group, Inc.
67.9
$339.13 · $40.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.4
EXPE leads
RSI
Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
54.5
$26.42 · $6.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestEXPE20.2x
- Fastest growthRSI+34.3%
- Strongest balance sheetRSI0.02
- Highest qualityEXPE85 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueEXPE-44%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EXPE
stronger →← stronger
RSI
85
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
78
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
74
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
41
EXPE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EXPE
RSI
$4.5bB
FCF
$182mC
+12.0%B
Rev
+34.3%A
2.30C
D/E
0.02A
20.2xB
P/E
82.6xD
1.00B+
PEG
2.39C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EXPE
RSI
44% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
116% above
~-4%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~36%/yr
+52%
1-yr DCF upside
-64%
+78%
5-yr DCF upside
-54%
+124%
10-yr DCF upside
-33%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EXPE
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
RSI
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
The companies
EXPEExpedia Group, Inc.
Why now
Travel Services · market cap $40.7b. Trading near 52-week high of $341.09 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 35 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $336.23 (implying -1% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 2.30 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
RSIRush Street Interactive, Inc.
Why now
Gambling · market cap $6.5b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $34.53 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +34% — in hypergrowth territory. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $36.00 (implying +36% upside).
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 82.6x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Beta 1.52 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Net margin 2.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where EXPE and RSI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 13.4 points in favor of EXPE. The widest single difference is Value, where EXPE leads by 32.6 points.
- ValueEXPE 74.0 · RSI 41.4EXPE +32.6
- QualityEXPE 84.7 · RSI 78.2EXPE +6.5
- GrowthEXPE 50.0 · RSI 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.