COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
GPOR vs RRC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. GPOR scored 64.5, RRC scored 66.3 — RRC leads.
Compare another set
GPOR
Gulfport Energy Corporation
64.5
$173.45 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.8
RRC leads
RRC
Range Resources Corporation
66.3
$41.06 · $9.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestGPOR6.6x
- Fastest growthGPOR+35.2%
- Strongest balance sheetRRC0.22
- Highest qualityRRC89 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueRRC-44%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
GPOR
stronger →← stronger
RRC
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
89
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
GPOR and RRC split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
GPOR
RRC
$250mC
FCF
$1.4bC+
+35.2%A
Rev
+17.3%B+
0.50B
D/E
0.22A-
6.6xA
P/E
11.3xB+
0.36A
PEG
1.03B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
GPOR
RRC
41% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
44% below
~-1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-14%/yr
+38%
1-yr DCF upside
+95%
+68%
5-yr DCF upside
+79%
+124%
10-yr DCF upside
+59%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
GPOR
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
RRC
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
The companies
GPORGulfport Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $3.1b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $225.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +35% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $227.08 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Net margin 32% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
RRCRange Resources Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $9.6b. 15% off the 52-week high of $48.31. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $45.64 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 26% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 158% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
RRC leads GPOR by 1.5 points (66.2 to 64.7), its sharpest advantage coming in D/E (grade A-). A contrarian could still prefer GPOR, which trades about 41% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward. Note they play different roles — GPOR screens as value, RRC screens as growth — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where GPOR and RRC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.8 points in favor of RRC. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityGPOR 76.6 · RRC 89.0RRC +12.4
- ValueGPOR 70.0 · RRC 65.3GPOR +4.7
- GrowthGPOR 50.0 · RRC 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.