COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
ROST vs TPR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ROST scored 46.5, TPR scored 65.7 — TPR leads.
Compare another set
ROST
Ross Stores, Inc.
46.5
$241.52 · $77.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
19.2
TPR leads
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
65.7
$132.16 · $26.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestTPR17.9x
- Fastest growthTPR+14.2%
- Strongest balance sheetROST0.70
- Highest qualityROST83 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ROST
stronger →← stronger
TPR
83
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
75
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
81
16
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
43
TPR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ROST
TPR
$2.6bB
FCF
$1.8bC+
+11.9%B
Rev
+14.2%B+
0.70B+
D/E
5.72D
28.9xC+
P/E
17.9xB+
2.82C
PEG
1.86C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ROST
TPR
66% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
13% above
~18%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~11%/yr
-43%
1-yr DCF upside
-20%
-40%
5-yr DCF upside
-11%
-35%
10-yr DCF upside
+2%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ROST
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
TPR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
ROSTRoss Stores, Inc.
Why now
Apparel Retail · market cap $77.5b. 6% off the 52-week high of $257.00. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $269.94 (implying +12% upside).
Moat
ROE 37% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 114% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $77.5b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
TPRTapestry, Inc.
Why now
Luxury Goods · market cap $26.4b. 20% off the 52-week high of $164.80. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $167.40 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 119% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 5.72 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Beta 1.46 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ROST and TPR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 19.2 points in favor of TPR. The widest single difference is Value, where TPR leads by 26.4 points.
- ValueROST 16.3 · TPR 42.7TPR +26.4
- GrowthROST 74.5 · TPR 81.1TPR +6.6
- QualityROST 82.6 · TPR 81.9level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.