Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ROL scored 67.9, SCI scored 47.0 — ROL leads.
Compare another set
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
Personal Services · Quality-Growth
67.9
$31.98 · $15.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
20.9
ROL leads
SCI
Service Corporation International
Personal Services · Quality-Growth
47
$76.91 · $10.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestSCI20.1x
Fastest growthROL+9.9%
Strongest balance sheetROL0.78
Highest qualityROL86 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueSCI-5%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ROL
stronger →← stronger
SCI
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
73
70
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
49
52
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
29
ROL is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ROL
SCI
$619mC+
FCF
$635mC+
+9.9%B
Rev
+2.9%C
0.78B
D/E
3.45C
29.1xC
P/E
20.1xB
2.59C
PEG
1.38B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ROL
SCI
14% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
5% below
~10%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~3%/yr
-20%
1-yr DCF upside
+5%
-12%
5-yr DCF upside
+6%
0%
10-yr DCF upside
+7%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ROL
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Durable high returns
SCI
Why this score
Buying back stock
Raising its dividend
The companies
ROLRollins, Inc.
Personal Services · $31.98 · beta 0.73
Why now
Personal Services · market cap $15.4b. Down 52% from 52-week high of $66.14 — deep drawdown territory. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $42.41 (implying +33% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 37% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 116% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 52% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
SCIService Corporation International
Personal Services · $76.91 · beta 0.82
Why now
Personal Services · market cap $10.5b. 15% off the 52-week high of $90.99. 6 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $100.33 (implying +30% upside).
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 35% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 118% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
D/E 3.45 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ROL and SCI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 20.9 points in favor of ROL. The widest single difference is Value, where ROL leads by 22.7 points.
ValueROL 51.7 · SCI 29.0ROL +22.7
GrowthROL 70.3 · SCI 49.4ROL +20.9
QualityROL 86.3 · SCI 72.8ROL +13.5
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is ROL or SCI the better stock?
ROL scores higher: ROL 67.9, SCI 47.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do ROL and SCI differ most?
The widest gap is value, where ROL leads by 23 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. ROL leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are ROL and SCI scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.