COMPARE · Data as of October 9, 2026

ROL vs FTDR

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ROL scored 67.9, FTDR scored 68.7 — FTDR leads.
Compare another set
ROL
Rollins, Inc.
Personal Services · Quality-Growth
67.9
$31.98 · $15.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.8
FTDR leads
FTDR
Frontdoor, Inc.
Personal Services · Quality-Growth
68.7
$79.80 · $5.5B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestFTDR21.1x
  • Fastest growthROL+9.9%
  • Strongest balance sheetROL0.78
  • Highest qualityFTDR87 / 100
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD67.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY86.3GROWTH70.3VALUE51.7
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD68.7/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY87.4GROWTH72.5VALUE51.3
ROLFTDRQuality86.387.4Growth70.372.5Value51.751.3
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-1%20%16x34xROLFTDR

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFROL$619mFTDR$386m
RevROL+9.9%FTDR+9.3%
D/EROL0.78FTDR4.17
P/EROL29.1xFTDR21.1x
PEGROL2.59FTDR2.38
ROL
stronger →← stronger
FTDR
86
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
87
70
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
72
52
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
51
FTDR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
ROL
FTDR
$619mC+
FCF
$386mC
+9.9%B
Rev
+9.3%B
0.78B
D/E
4.17D
29.1xC
P/E
21.1xC+
2.59C
PEG
2.38C
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
ROL
FTDR
14% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
21% above
~10%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~12%/yr
-20%
1-yr DCF upside
-23%
-12%
5-yr DCF upside
-17%
0%
10-yr DCF upside
-9%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
ROL
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
  • Durable high returns
FTDR
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Durable high returns
ROLRollins, Inc.
Personal Services · $31.98 · beta 0.73
Why now
Personal Services · market cap $15.4b. Down 52% from 52-week high of $66.14 — deep drawdown territory. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $42.41 (implying +33% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 37% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 116% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 52% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
FTDRFrontdoor, Inc.
Personal Services · $79.80 · beta 1.53
Why now
Personal Services · market cap $5.5b. 15% off the 52-week high of $93.43. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $97.40 (implying +22% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 96% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 141% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
D/E 4.17 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Beta 1.53 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Common questions

Is FTDR or ROL the better stock?

FTDR scores higher: FTDR 68.7, ROL 67.9 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

How are FTDR and ROL scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.