Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ROK scored 57.7, WTS scored 69.6 — WTS leads.
Compare another set
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
Specialty Industrial Machinery · Quality-Growth
57.7
$432.59 · $48.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
11.9
WTS leads
WTS
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
Specialty Industrial Machinery · Quality-Growth
69.6
$352.72 · $11.8B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestWTS30.8x
Fastest growthWTS+17.1%
Strongest balance sheetWTS0.10
Highest qualityROK82 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ROK
stronger →← stronger
WTS
82
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
81
77
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
85
31
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
49
WTS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ROK
WTS
$1.5bC+
FCF
$349mC
+11.3%B
Rev
+17.1%B+
1.03C+
D/E
0.10A
40.5xC
P/E
30.8xC+
1.91C+
PEG
3.08D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ROK
WTS
149% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
119% above
~33%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~28%/yr
-63%
1-yr DCF upside
-58%
-60%
5-yr DCF upside
-54%
-54%
10-yr DCF upside
-49%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $48.1b. 13% off the 52-week high of $497.36. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 26 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $477.12 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 34% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 129% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Beta 1.50 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 41x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Specialty Industrial Machinery · market cap $11.8b. 11% off the 52-week high of $394.54. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $404.00 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
Net margin 14% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 18% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Trailing P/E 31x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ROK and WTS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 11.9 points in favor of WTS. The widest single difference is Value, where WTS leads by 18.5 points.
ValueROK 30.7 · WTS 49.2WTS +18.5
GrowthROK 76.6 · WTS 84.7WTS +8.1
QualityROK 81.8 · WTS 80.7level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is WTS or ROK the better stock?
WTS scores higher: WTS 69.6, ROK 57.7 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do WTS and ROK differ most?
The widest gap is value, where WTS leads by 19 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. WTS also leads growth, while quality is effectively level between them.
How are WTS and ROK scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.